Hey Reader - it’s good to do this again. Welcome back. I’m going to be playing around with some different formats and approaches over the next few weeks as I look to work this into a sustainable habit again. First things first - I’ve swapped things back to the original name/theme. AI is here to stay. I hate its well-documented impacts on energy and water consumption but am reminded of Robert Greene’s take on what to do about power: So here’s some things that are happening:
US: Passing a 10-year ban on AI regulation by the StatesA large budget reconciliation bill is moving through congress that includes a small clause baning state regulation of AI. I won’t pretend to understand the bits and nuances of this, but the (limited) commentary around is what’s interesting to me. Some excerpts from /r/ArtificialIntelligence: I feel like something extremely fishy is cooking rn
At a time when AI is the biggest thing, a 1000 page bill has one paragraph about AI?! Thats kinda insane man
– And all the towns suffering the environmental impacts of these AI data centers will get to the point of being unlivable.
What great thing we have going fellas.
– yeah it’s weird how something that major just slips in like that. one paragraph on ai in a huge bill feels off, especially when ai is moving faster than most can keep up with
There’s a bigger discussion of the bill in TechPolicy.press which shares details about the bill originating from a conservative think tank called R Street Institute, and this pearler of a quote from OpenAI CEO Sam Altman re: less regulation at a committee hearing: “I’m not sure what a 10-year learning period means, but I think having one federal approach focused on light touch and even playing field sounds great to me.” Another area discussions cropped up was in the subreddit /r/biglaw: Is anyone on this thread concerned about the no regulation on AI for ten years in the bill passed? If passed, states could no longer enforce unauthorized practice of law which was the strongest moat we had. How is this not terrifying people? Do people just not know because it is snuck in with so much other stuff? There’s not much concern in there, but I’m wondering if quotes like the below age well: The strongest moat we have is being educated, trained, and experienced. Over the centuries, technology has always promised to level the playing field between professionals and non-professionals but in the end it has only ever amplified the capability gap. Artificial intelligence is no different than any other technology ever invented.
The strongest moat we have is that all of the LLM models still, to put it as kindly as possible, suck. They are not even close to replacing lawyers and it hasn’t gotten appreciably better since the first models saw wide release 2.5 years ago. I wouldn’t worry.
The fact that moments like this barely rank a murmur in what I can find is the other interesting part to this. If I was betting the house on AI being an incredible power and had everything to gain from that being right, cosying up to lawmakers and burying amendments to laws to ratify that power would absolutely be the playbook I would be following. Uninvited guests appearing in FB groupsAnother sneaky change happened this week that felt weird. For some context - I’m a huge fan of the AFL club Western Bulldogs. We’re one of the less decorated clubs, have won two premierships (one in 2016 that I got to witness) and our team is in the colours red, white, and blue. I’m active in one of the FB groups and we had a new member join this week: Here’s the funny bits:
Here’s the shit bits:
It reminded me of an IRL example of an American showing up and just annoying me out of the blue. I was on holiday in Thailand and had been for a run before boarding one of the boats to get off the island. I was wearing a t-shirt by The Oatmeal that read “I do not believe in the wall, I believe in the blerch” Cutting through my post-workout fugue was an irritating US accent: “Is that t-shirt talking about OUR wall?” At the time, Trump was crapping on about a wall. Me: “Ahh, no. It’s from a comic artist I really like and is about running.” Them: “Oh.” Well this week the online equivalent of that just happened in my football group. Building AI machines that do thingsI finished a major project last week and have a lot of energy and curiosity about things I can be doing. Something I’ve been exploring of late is building “AI machines” that do more complex tasks. The current capabilities are better than ever, and if you know what you’re doing (or can figure it out), there’s gains to be made. First, here’s an overview of the things needed:
There’s a growing hype community of these capabilities on YouTube like Voice AI calller, Video analyser, and 24/7 Sales agent. You can take these with a grain of salt. The vast majority of these are excited young people babbling about the possibilities of what they can do. What they lack is connection to real-world business challenges and problems that need solving. What I’ve been working on is connecting that knowledge and capability to those problems. A couple of friends came to me with these problems and I’ve been building proof of concepts for solving them. One is in the graduate recruitment world, and another is focused on how certain public companies commmunicate their results. The beauty of this approach is that even if both of these opportunities fizzle, there’s merit to stress-testing them with the capabilities that exist right now. A common task I’ve done as a freelancer is build digital strategies - dozens and dozens of them. They follow a process:
A lot these same processes can be fed into workflows, LLM APIs, the web, and produce output that’s comparable/similar to what I’ve produced, and become even more powerful with expert-level oversight. So I’ll be investigating this rigorously over the next few months (and uncovering more business problems to solve) as I look to find new ways to build my business post-major project. If you’ve got thoughts, comments, or questions about this let me know. – Thanks, -Marshy p.s. I suspected this would be a long one, one thing I’m also thinking about is creating a tool for splitting up this content into smaller pieces for my website, Instagram, LinkedIn, and YouTube |
I write about growth, automation, and AI and its impact.
a braindump. Hi Reader, I disappeared for a while. I’m sorry - late last year I joined a startup, then earlier this year went full-time contract on it with a high-risk, go big, or go home kind of bid. We’re now in the latter stages of that bid and at the “omgwtf I’m not sure if this is going to work out” stage, and look: I got what I signed up for. It’s been eye-opening and gratifying jumping onto the tools and building a growth engine for another business and if it doesn’t work it won’t be...
the results are in. Last week I said I had a bit of spare time and wanted to test more video with shorts. This is what happened in the last week: Not bad right? Well actually in the scheme things - it’s unprecedented. Here’s the lifetime view count of my channel: The number’s pathetic. It’s never been a focus, and while I love presenting, have never been inclined to go hard at it because I have other things to do (like work for clients, raise my family, get sober and completely transform my...
a tierlist for growth channels. Have you heard of tier lists? They’re very common in gaming world. Influencers like to put together lists ranking characters, items, or selections and opine on them. I had a quieter week as I work through a project exension and thought: Do you know what the world needs? A tierlist for growth channels for startups. But not just any tierlist, but grabbing and ranking the channels from the book Traction. Written in 2015 Here’s the channels from the book: •...